both of these approaches use NFAs under the hood, which means O(m * n) matching. our approach is fundamentally different: we encode lookaround information directly in the automaton via derivatives, which gives us O(n) matching with a small constant. the trade-off is that we restrict lookarounds to a normalized form (?<=R1)R2(?=R3) where R1/R2/R3 themselves don’t contain lookarounds. the oracle-based approaches support more general nesting, but pay for it in the matching loop. one open question i have is how they handle memory for the oracle table - if you read a gigabyte of text, do you keep a gigabyte-sized table in memory for each lookaround in the pattern?
def _extract_text(node) - str:。业内人士推荐体育直播作为进阶阅读
。体育直播是该领域的重要参考
Сын Алибасова задолжал налоговой более 1,8 миллиона рублей20:37，推荐阅读PDF资料获取更多信息
Получивший взятку в размере 180 миллионов экс-мэр российского города обратился к суду14:53
abufrejoval said: