Git packfiles use delta compression, storing only the diff when a 10MB file changes by one line, while the objects table stores each version in full. A file modified 100 times takes about 1GB in Postgres versus maybe 50MB in a packfile. Postgres does TOAST and compress large values, but that’s compressing individual objects in isolation, not delta-compressing across versions the way packfiles do, so the storage overhead is real. A delta-compression layer that periodically repacks objects within Postgres, or offloads large blobs to S3 the way LFS does, is a natural next step. For most repositories it still won’t matter since the median repo is small and disk is cheap, and GitHub’s Spokes system made a similar trade-off years ago, storing three full uncompressed copies of every repository across data centres because redundancy and operational simplicity beat storage efficiency even at hundreds of exabytes.
回避 AI 并不会帮助你或你的职业。，推荐阅读搜狗输入法2026获取更多信息
力量从思想中汲取，党的创新理论成果引领新的实践。，详情可参考搜狗输入法2026
Овечкин продлил безголевую серию в составе Вашингтона09:40
Медведев вышел в финал турнира в Дубае17:59